Connecticut Judicial Branch:
Firearms Safety Warrants (Information about warrants that allow
police officers to search for and take firearms away from someone when
there is a risk of personal injury)
Criminal Jury Instructions -
Criminal Jury Instructions -
Firearms Permit Examiners:
Special Licensing and Firearms:
Department of Environmental
OLR Research Reports - Office of Legislative Research:
The Judicial Branch law libraries hold a number of items which may
be of help to the person researching firearms law. The Subject
Headings below are recommended, and can be entered as subject
searches using our
on-line catalog, or
Contact us for availability of materials.
- Firearms -- Law and
legislation -- Connecticut
- Firearms -- Law and
legislation -- United States
Connecticut General Statutes
CT Assault Weapon Statutes (Much of Chapter 943 is relevant. Selected
sections linked below)
Sec. 53-202. Machine guns
Sec. 53-202a. Assault
Sec. 53-202b. Sale or transfer of assault weapon prohibited. Class C
Sec. 53-202c. Possession of assault weapon prohibited. Class D felony.
Sec. 53-202e. Relinquishment of assault weapon to law enforcement
Sec. 53-202f. Transportation of assault weapon. Authorized actions of
Sec. 53-202g. Report of theft of assault weapon.
Sec. 53-202j. Commission of a class A, B or C felony with an assault
weapon: Eight-year nonsuspendable sentence.
Sec. 53-202k. Commission of a class A, B or C felony with a firearm:
Five-year nonsuspendable sentence.
Sec. 53-202o. Affirmative defense in prosecution for possession of
specified assault weapon
CT Penal Code: Statutory Construction; Principles of Criminal Liability
(Selected sections linked below)
Sec. 53a-18. Use of reasonable physical force or deadly physical force
Sec. 53a-19. Use of physical force in defense of person.
Sec. 53a-20. Use of physical force in defense of premises.
Sec. 53a-21. Use of physical force in defense of property.
Sec. 53a-22. Use of physical force in making arrest or preventing
53a-217b. Possession of a weapon on school grounds: Class D felony
Sec. 53a-217e. Negligent hunting.
Division of State Police (Much of Chapter 529 is relevant. Selected sections
Sec. 29-10a. Use of state police rifle ranges by civilian rifle clubs.
"Pistol" and "revolver"ï¿½ defined.
Sec. 29-28. Permit for sale at retail of pistol or revolver. Permit to
carry pistol or revolver. Confidentiality of name and address of permit
holder. Permits for out-of-state residents.
Sec. 29-28a. Application for permit. Notice of decision to applicant.
Sec. 29-29. Information concerning criminal records of applicants for
Sec. 29-30. Fees for pistol and revolver permits. Expiration and renewal
Sec. 29-32. Revocation of permit. Notification. Confiscation. Penalty
for failure to surrender permit.
Sec. 29-32b. Board of Firearms Permit Examiners. Appeals to board.
Sec. 29-33. Sale, delivery or transfer of pistols and revolvers.
Sec. 29-35. Carrying of pistol or revolver without permit prohibited.
Sec. 29-36f. Eligibility certificate for pistol or revolver.
Sec. 29-36fg. Application for eligibility certificate. Criminal history
records check. Deadline for approval or denial of application. Form of
certificate. Change of address. Confidentiality of name and address of
certificate holder. Scope of certificate.
Sec. 29-36h. Fee for eligibility certificate. Expiration and renewal of
Sec. 29-36i. Revocation of eligibility certificate.
Sec. 29-36j. Purchase or receipt of pistol or revolver without permit or
eligibility certificate prohibited. Exceptions.
29-37i. Responsibilities re storage of loaded firearms with
respect to minors.
Fisheries and Game
Sec. 26-73. Hunting on Sunday.
Sec. 26-86a. Game management. Deer hunting; permitted weapons,
locations, bag limits. Consent forms; permits, selection process.
State v. Clark, 264 Conn. 723 (2003)
(Appeal from appellate court decision; Manslaughter in the first degree;
Self-defense; Trial court instructions on defense of self-defense; Judgment
of appellate court affirmed, with different reasoning)
State v. Abney, 88 Conn. App. 495 (2005)
(Appeal from trial court; Manslaughter in the first degree; Self-defense;
Exclusion of evidence; Improper jury instructions; Trial court judgment
reversed; Case remanded for new trial)
Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms
(Congress, through the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act … has
broadly prohibited lawsuits “against manufacturers, distributors, dealers,
and importers of firearms … for the harm solely caused by the criminal or
unlawful use of firearm products … by others when the product functioned as
designed and intended.” … The present case seeks damages for harms … that
were caused solely by the criminal misuse of a weapon by Adam Lanza.
Accordingly, this action falls squarely within the broad immunity provided
by the PLCAA.)
Voisine et al,. v. United States 136 S. Ct. 2272 (2016)
("In an effort to “close [a] dangerous loophole” in the gun control laws,
United States v. Castleman, 572 U. S. ___, ___, Congress extended the federal
prohibition on firearms possession by convicted felons to persons convicted
of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,” 18 U. S. C. §922(g)(9).
Section 921(a)(33)(A) defines that phrase to include a misdemeanor under
federal, state, or tribal law, committed against a domestic relation that
necessarily involves the “use . . . of physical force.” In Castleman,
this Court held that a knowing or intentional assault qualifies as such a
crime, but left open whether the same was true of a reckless assault.
Held: A reckless domestic assault qualifies as a “misdemeanor crime
of domestic violence” under §922(g)(9).")
Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008)
("We consider whether a
District of Columbia prohibition on the possession of usable handguns in the
home violates the Second Amendment to the Constitution.")
Chicago, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010)
("Two years ago, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. ___ (2008), we
held that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms for
the purpose of self-defense, and we struck down a District of Columbia law
that banned the possession of handguns in the home. The city of Chicago
(City) and the village of Oak Park, a Chicago suburb, have laws that are
similar to the District of Columbia's, but Chicago and Oak Park argue that
their laws are constitutional because the Second Amendment has no
application to the States. We have previously held that most of the
provisions of the Bill of Rights apply with full force to both the Federal
Government and the States. Applying the standard that is well established in
our case law, we hold that the Second Amendment right is fully applicable to
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms