Connecticut Judicial Branch Law Libraries   Books

Connecticut Law About Vexatious Litigation
These links connect to resources available and are provided with the understanding
that they represent only a starting point for research.

External Link - You are leaving the Connecticut Judicial Branch website This web page has many external links to valuable resources. Please view our Linkage Policy for more information.

Research Guides

  Connecticut General Statutes

Research guides prepared by the Connecticut Judicial Branch law librarians:

OLR Research Reports - Office of Legislative Research:
  • Vexations Litigation and Sanctions Against Attorney - 2008-R-0101
    You asked for information on vexatious litigation and whether the statute or other sanctions might apply to prejudgment remedies. You also asked for statistics on how often the vexatious litigation statute is used.

Library Materials

  • Tort Remedies in Connecticut. by Richard L. Newman & Jeffrey S. Wildstein.
    • Chapter 12. Intentional Torts
      • § 12-3. Malicious Prosecution and Vexatious Suit
         
  • Connecticut Law of Torts, Third Edition. by Douglas B. Wright et al.
    • § 160. Introduction
    • § 162. Vexatious Suit

These titles are available at each of your local law libraries.

 

Selected Statutes:

Connecticut Practice Book

Selected Rules:

Recent Case Law

  • Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican, 286 Conn. 548 (2008)
    "The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that a prejudgment remedy application is not a civil action for purposes of a subsequent claim for the tort of vexatious litigation. We agree that such an application is not a civil action for purposes of a subsequent claim for vexatious litigation, and accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court."

  • Lopes v. Farmer, 286 Conn. 384 (2008)
    “In this malicious prosecution brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, the plaintiff appeals from the grant of summary judgment rendered in favor of defendants.  On appeal, the plaintiff claims the trial court improperly concluded that his claims against the defendants were barred by the statute of limitations.  We agree, and accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.”

 Connecticut Law by Subject