Criminal Jury Instructions Home

6.1-7  Assault in the Second Degree (Intentional with a Deadly Weapon) -- § 53a-60 (a) (2)

Revised to December 1, 2007

The defendant is charged [in count ___] with assault in the second degree.  The statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows: 

a person is guilty of assault in the second degree when with intent to cause physical injury to another person, (he/she) causes such injury to such person or to a third person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument other than by means of the discharge of a firearm.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Intent to cause physical injury
The first element is that the defendant specifically intended to cause physical injury to another person.  A person acts "intentionally" with respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result.  <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>

"Physical injury" is defined as impairment of physical condition or pain.  It is a reduced ability to act as one would otherwise have acted.  The law does not require that the injury be serious.  It may be minor.

Element 2 - Caused physical injury
The second element is that the defendant caused physical injury to another person.  This means that the defendant's conduct was the proximate cause of the person's injuries.  You must find it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert name of person injured> was injured as a result of the actions of the defendant.  <See Proximate Cause, Instruction 2.6-1.>

[<If person injured was not the person intended:>  It does not matter whether <insert name of person injured> was the person upon whom the defendant intended to inflict physical injury.  It is sufficient if you find that the defendant intended to cause physical injury to another person and that (he/she) in fact caused physical injury to that person or to some other person.]

Element 3 - With deadly weapon or dangerous instrument
The third element is that the defendant caused the injury by means of a (deadly weapon / dangerous instrument) other than by means of the discharge of a firearm.  <Insert the appropriate definition:>

• "Deadly weapon" is defined by statute as any weapon, whether loaded or unloaded, from which a shot may be discharged, or a switchblade knife, gravity knife, billy, blackjack, bludgeon, or metal knuckles.  If the weapon is a firearm, it may be unloaded, but it must be in such condition that a shot may be discharged from it.  Thus, if the weapon is loaded but not in working order, it is not a deadly weapon.  If the weapon is unloaded but in working order, it is a deadly weapon.  Any injury caused by a deadly weapon must be by means other than the discharge of a firearm.

• "Dangerous instrument" is defined by statute as any instrument, article or substance which, under the circumstances in which it is used or attempted or threatened to be used, is capable of causing death or serious physical injury.  It is important to note that the article need not be inherently dangerous; all that is required is that the article was capable of causing death or serious physical injury under the circumstances in which it was used.  Any article or substance, without limitation and even though harmless under normal use, may be found by you to be a dangerous instrument, if under the circumstances of its use or threatened or attempted use, it is readily capable of producing serious physical injury or death.

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant had the specific intent to cause physical injury to <insert name of person injured >, 2) the defendant did cause physical injury to <insert name of person injured >, and 3) the defendant caused the injury by means of a (deadly weapon / dangerous instrument) other than by means of the discharge of a firearm. 

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements of the crime of assault in the second degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty.  On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.